The Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of Indonesia held a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) on the Academic Draft of Punishment System in Taxation Crimes at the Santika Hotel Semarang, Central Java.
In this scientific event, the Head of the Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary, in his opening remarks, said that the handling of taxation crimes has a vital position in the system or policy efforts to overcome and prevent losses or leakage of essential state revenues.
The Supreme Court has issued several regulations, including the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2021 on the Application of Several Provisions in Taxation Crimes Handling, to guide judges in handling tax criminal cases.
The results of this academic paper are expected to be submitted as strategic proposals or recommendations for handling tax criminal cases in the future.
Mataram: September 8, 2022:
Judges are required to mine the material truth behind the formal truth in dealing with the land mafia. The above statement was delivered by Dr. Pri Pambudi Teguh, SH, MH, Supreme Judge at the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia as the sole speaker in a public lecture: "Legal Protection in the Utilization of Land, Assets and Property for Investment and Public Interest" held by the Faculty of Law, Mataram University.
Based on the context, according to Pri Pambudi, there are many parties or individuals exploits the condition for money game by using unlawful means to control and own land or land that does not belong to them by speculating on formal documents that show ownership of land rights that do not actually belong to them.
It is not easy to find and prove the material truth that has been obscured by the land mafia, because they often create alternative truths (post-truth), or lies about the real facts or factual truths.
Therefore, to face and handle various cases of land mafia, Pri Pambudi Teguh, reminded judges of the need to know several indications of land mafia practices, such as (i) the absence of complete legal documents on land objects; (ii) the absence of legal rights (recht titel) or the basis of rights in land ownership and control; and (iii) and irregularities in the process of ownership of land objects.
The above indications can be the beginning of the search or excavation of material truth behind the formal truth proposed by the land mafia. The idea above, according to him, can help the duties and obligations of noral judges in finding the truth which is the basis for a just decision. In addition, examination using the above indicators can prevent the widespread practice of illegal land ownership and control.
The Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of the Indonesian Supreme Court held an Academic Draft Preparation about "Concept and Implementation of the Administrative Court Authority in Resolving Government Administration Disputes after Administrative Efforts." The forum took place at the Four Points by Sheraton Hotel, Makassar, South Sulawesi, on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.
This event presents three speakers: the Chairman of the Makassar Administrative High Court, Professor of the Faculty of Administrative Law at Hasanuddin University, and Professor of the Faculty of Administration Law at the Indonesian Moslem University. The Head of the Research and Development Training Center for Law and Judiciary, Bambang H. Mulyono, said that this activity was a proposal to amend Supreme Court Regulation. The Regulation is number 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of Government Administration Disputes after Administrative Efforts. PERMA 6/2018 guides Administrative Court Judges in resolving government administration disputes after the parties have made administrative efforts.
"From this forum, I hope that a mechanism will be agreed upon that will be able to maximize the function of the Administrative Court in resolving administrative disputes that can benefit each party and minimize the tendency to win and lose in case of settlements because, however, the resolution of administrative disputes should be expected to benefit the state but on the other hand not harm the interests of the community," said Bambang H. Mulyono when closing his speech and opening the event.
This academic draft is expected to contribute ideas for judges and state administrative court officials in resolving government administration lawsuits.